Showing posts with label Angela Merkel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Angela Merkel. Show all posts

29 April 2013

Week ending 26th April 2013


A year ago it looked as though the end game was in sight for the euro, then things quietened down.  The general view was that somehow the Eurozone would muddle its way through to a solution over time.  However the Eurozone reappeared last week in the business, economic and political sections of the media and it seems nothing much has changed or is likely to and the slide continues.

Mrs. Merkel mentions the war

Spain’s unemployment has continued to rise and hit a new record of 27% with 57% of under 25s out of work.  Italy has finally cobbled together a government which includes Silvio Berlusconi’s party so not much change there.
Stern Auntie Angela is once again pushing for stricter Europe-wide control over national budgets, still pursuing the idea that if only everyone could be more like the Germans then all would be well.  This is diametrically opposed to the French position that wants banking union or in other words if only everyone could be more like the French then …. Well you get the picture.
The ability of the Eurozone politicians to come up with policies and proposals that effectively cancel each other out is not altogether surprising if you look at European history.  Differences like this arose regularly sometimes leading to war which would sort it out one way or the other.  Now that option is not available (thankfully) but the Eurozone doesn’t seem to have found an alternative that works so the differences and the problems they cause rumble on.
Of course this is what the euro was supposed to be all about.  A common currency leading to “ever closer union” would be the mechanism by which all differences would be resolved.  Indeed Auntie Angela has warned sternly of the risk of a return to conflict between European countries if the euro fails.  However it is clear from a number of developments from last week that the pressure on the euro is building.

Austerity light

With GDP throughout the Eurozone falling and even the German economy feeling the pinch it seems everyone (apart from stern Auntie Angela) is questioning whether austerity has gone too far.  Almost any country that cares to ask is being granted an extension to deficit reduction targets.  The IMF came out with a strange argument that George Osborne was “playing with fire” by pursuing the current rate of deficit reduction in the UK and that there is the “fiscal space” in the UK to indulge in a bit of “fiscal loosening”.   The mood appears to be swinging towards the idea that some sort of “light touch” austerity is the answer because austerity itself has become the problem.
All this is a classic and big scale example of tackling symptoms rather than the core problem which is the euro itself.  In fact it’s worse than that.  When you tackle symptoms and this produces consequences you don’t much like this causes you to tackle these symptoms as well, so you get further and further away from the core problem.

No FTT no €30bn

An example of the Eurozone focusing on symptoms and not the problem is the attempt by Germany and 10 other countries to introduce a Financial Transactions Tax (FTT).  As the tax will apply to trades across the world if they originate in one of these 11 countries it is not surprising that many other countries including the US and UK are against it.  A Swedish minister has warned that it will be a disaster and will not work.  He should know as he actually introduced it in Sweden and found it was a disaster and didn’t work.
Last week Jens Weidman President of the Bundesbank no less announced that “From a monetary policy point of view, the FTT in its current form is to be viewed critically”.  He also warned that it could raise the costs of government borrowing and outweigh the revenues raised by the tax.  I think we can take that as a “nein”.
The only argument I have found in favour of the FTT is that it could raise up to €30bn which would be used to …lower government deficits!  Well perhaps, but if it raises borrowing costs then once again the EU will have cancelled itself out and long since lost sight of the real problem.
George Osborne has taken to matter to the European courts.  It would be rather good if he could get the European Court of Human Rights to rule against FTT.  Would be almost worth putting up with Abu Qatada to win that one.

Whatever it takes or whatever it costs?

One of the moves that kept the lid on the whole mess for a while was the European Central Bank (ECB) becoming in effect the lender of last resort in the Eurozone.  Last summer it launched its emergency rescue strategy, Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT), buying up the bonds of countries like Spain and Italy and bringing about a spectacular fall in their borrowing costs.  This followed Mario Draghi’s statement that he would do “whatever it takes” to deal with the Eurozone’s sovereign debt problems.
However he omitted to mention that his plan required the German taxpayer to “pay whatever it takes”.  Last week the Bundesbank having poo pooed the FTT did the same to OMT, taking it apart point by point.  Germany’s constitutional court is due to rule on the legality of OMT in June.  If it rules against OMT it pretty much means the end of the euro.  With stakes that high the markets seem confident the court will find some formula to avert that kind of crisis.  However it does show just how close run this is all getting.

Italian job

Now that we have a new Italian government perhaps we will see some action to stop the Italian economy choking to death.  However be careful what you wish for.  Strangely Italy is not fundamentally a basket case, its problem being lack of competitiveness brought about by letting its labour costs race 30pc ahead of Germany’s.  In particular it has a primary surplus of 2.5pc of GDP (something George Osborne can only dream about currently).  This means Italy could leave the EMU and regain competitiveness without facing a funding crisis.
So why doesn’t Italy do just that?  Mainly because its political leaders have not so far been prepared to play rough.  The latest PM Enrico Letta does not look like the man to change that and the government he now heads is unlikely to last long enough to achieve anything meaningful.  But even with a PM who was very nearly named after a cup of weak coffee, you never know.

Why does all this matter

You may be wondering why I am boring you all to death with this stuff.  Last week the UK GDP figures were published and apparently we managed a whole 0.3pc growth in the last quarter, avoiding the triple dip, which sounds more like the latest offer from KFC than a meaningful economic concept.  Also it was reported that many businesses are sitting on mountains of cash and are reluctant to invest and even more reluctant to borrow to invest.  Behind the flat economy and reluctance to invest is uncertainty and that uncertainty is all about what’s going to happen in the Eurozone.  Even when nothing does happen what might happen is scary enough to keep most CEs and FDs awake at night and holding on to their cash cushions.
So the crisis and the uncertainty are set to continue. The UK’s and indeed the world economy cannot recover properly until the EU faces up to the fact that the euro in its current form just cannot work.

So that was some of the week before this week. We hope you found some of the above thought provoking and useful for you and your business. We trust you had a good weekend and hope you have a great week this week.

19 August 2012

That was week ending 17th August 2012


Invisible Transport Secretary

It was announced last week that FirstGroup had won the new franchise to run the West Coast line, outbidding the current operator Virgin Trains. The deciding factor appears to be First Group’s offer of £5.5bn for the franchise, 15pc more than Virgin’s. However the more I look at this the weirder the whole thing becomes.
The award of a rail franchise of this importance and value is a heady brew of business, the economy and politics. The interests of the taxpayer are not just about maximising the revenues from the franchise. This service and its operations are important national assets which must be sustained and enhanced into the future. And yet the government has accepted the highest bid from an operator with debt of 170pc of its market value and a revenue plan based on almost everything going right. Moreover FirstGroup would only have to pay £245m to hand the franchise back to the government if things don’t work out, so that is the extent of their risk. A case of heads they win, tails they don’t lose much. This happened with the East Coast line and that is still with the taxpayer 3 years later. At this rate the railways will be re-nationalised by stealth in about 10 years!
FirstGroup’s CEO Tim O’Toole says their bid is a “deliverable proposition” but Sir Richard Branson says it runs the risk of “almost certain bankruptcy”. They both would say that wouldn’t they. Sir Richard has cleverly almost attained the status of national treasure to become about the only high profile business person who currently could claim to be trusted by the public at large. Indeed if a public vote had been used to decide who should get the West Coast line then Virgin Trains would have won by a landslide. Curiously though Virgin have spent over £60m bidding for rail contracts over the last few years and failed to win a single one of them. What is it that the government and the transport ministry in particular don’t like or trust about Sir Richard and Virgin?
This is where the Transport Secretary Justine Greening comes in, or at least where she should come in. I cannot yet find a single statement or even a single word from her on the outcome of the West Coast Franchise bid. Usually when I dig into a politician’s background these days I invariably find that they are professional politicians who have never done a proper job. However not so with Ms Greening. She has an economics degree, an MBA and trained and qualified as an accountant. She worked as an accountant and finance manager for PWC, GSK and Centrica before going into politics. Consequently she should be perfectly capable of explaining to us ordinary mortals why accepting FirstGroup’s bid is in the interests of the taxpayers. Whilst she is at it she can also explain the logic of the latest fare increases. If they are needed to provide further investment in the rail system, then a bit more on how this is supposed to work would be welcome. Frankly I think it is the least she should do, otherwise what the hell is she there for? In fact is she actually there at all?
I predict this one will end in tears, though it may take some time before the tears begin to flow, by which time all the key players, including Ms Greening will have moved on.

The invisible CEO

Before Facebook’s IPO I urged anyone even vaguely contemplating buying the shares to go nowhere near them. Last week the shares dropped to $19.69, nearly half their listing price. Now I am not a professional share tipper or anything remotely like it but I can apply commonsense. One of the reasons I urged people to avoid the IPO is that Facebook’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg had declared himself not interested in making money. My reasoning was that if he is not interested in making money then that is exactly what is likely to happen. I don’t mind him not making money for himself, but I do mind him not making it for me.
Anyway his goal has been achieved, he is not making money and neither is anyone else. However just like our transport secretary we have heard nothing from him. He got married and went in his honeymoon immediately after the IPO, which is a pretty smart move in the light of what has happened to the share price. Surely he must be back from honeymoon by now and he must have some views that he could share with his deluded shareholders? However if he is not interested in making money then perhaps he feels it is all going according to plan, so what’s to say!

Invisible crisis

The tactic of sending all the Eurozone governments on holiday at the same time seems to have worked because for more than a month now it as if the financial crisis had never happened. Just occasionally there has been the odd bloop of news bubbling up like in a very slow cooking Bolognese sauce, but nothing to get alarmed about. Last week Greece even managed to sell €4bn worth of bonds which means they won’t default on an ECB bond repayment due this Monday. Borrowing money in order to pay money back is classed as good news now. Further “good news” was that Spain borrowed a record €402 from the ECB during July.
The Greek PM travels to Germany this week to meet Angela Merkel to ask for extra time (at least 2 years) to meet the austerity targets set in the second Greek bailout. A spokesperson for stern Auntie Angela declared “The German position, which is the European position, is based on the memorandum of understanding, which is the foundation”. A small prize to anyone who can tell me what that actually means, though to me it sounds like “flogging will continue until moral improves”. Which is not much comfort for the Greek PM?

And finally – the disappearing Dandy

The really sad news last week for any of us over 50 (or possibly 55) is that the Dandy comic is to cease publication. We may not have read it for many years but we would like to think that it is still there. When I read what they have tried to do to maintain its readership, introducing celebrity themed comic strips featuring Simon Cowell, Jamie Oliver and Jeremy Clarkson I realised where they have been going wrong.
They have been trying to appeal to children, when of course their real market is with adults who have never grown up, i.e. most men. By just sticking to their tried and tested formula with Korky the cat, Desperate Dan and Lord Snooty and his friends the Dandy would have been what it has always been and might still be there. Sometimes the real customers for your product or service may not be who you think they are.
There is some hope however in a witty observation from Letty Sykes from Rainham in Essex. In her letter to the Telegraph she writes “For me Desperate Dan will live on as long as Wayne Rooney Plays football”.
Have a good week.

So that was some of the week before this week. We hope you found some of the above thought provoking and useful for you and your business. We trust you had a good weekend and hope you have a great week this week.