I had intended that this week’s look at last week would
focus on the more humorous side of business, the economy and politics. However there have not been many stories to
chuckle about. Even those that contained
some vaguely amusing aspects left me not knowing whether to laugh or cry. So here are a few of last week’s stories that
illustrate some interesting aspects of human behaviour.
Regan of the SFO
This is an extraordinary story. The Serious Fraud Office’s pursuit of the
Tchenguiz brothers is more like an episode of the Sweeny than a serious
investigation. Last year the brothers were arrested in a dawn raid on their
properties (screeching tyres and “go, go, go" no doubt). Whatever the SFO hoped to find clearly they
didn’t as neither of the brothers have been charged and both continue to deny
any wrongdoing.
Not finding evidence never seemed to bother the Sweeney and
it doesn’t seem to bother the SFO either. They continue to pursue the case and
are now threatening a high profile investigation lasting 5 to 10 years (which
we would pay for) if the brothers don’t agree to a financial settlement. Not
even being accused by a high court judge of “sheer incompetence” has deterred
the SFO from blundering on. I don’t know whether the Tchenguiz brothers are
laughing or crying but I do have this mental picture of senior SFO
investigators snarling “shut it” at anyone who suggests they don’t have a case.
En garde c’est Lagarde
IMF director Christine Lagarde endorsed the coalition’s
austerity policy as the right course for the UK . However she also warned that
further measures were needed to get the economy growing again. So a sort of
“has done well, but now must do better” school report from the economics mistress.
She also used a new term to describe austerity measures,
“fiscal consolidation”. Amazingly no politician has picked up on this so far.
It is difficult to get people to vote for austerity as we all know what that
means. Or if we didn’t we do now. “Fiscal consolidation” on the other hand
might just sound sufficiently nothing really to do with the rest of us to sneak
under the radar.
Talking of politicians, the shadow chancellor Ed Balls leapt
up to claim that Ms Lagarde was right because she was agreeing with him. In her
statement “when trying to imagine what the situation would be like today
of no such fiscal consolidation programme had been decided, I shiver” she was clearly
talking about him, but not necessarily agreeing with him. When challenged in
interview, Balls responded that where she did not agree with his views she was
wrong. Right and wrong at the same time it seems.
Yell no more
I had thought that the most extreme example of pointless
rebranding had been the renaming of Norwich Union, one of the most well
established and trusted brand names in the financial services industry. This
became subsumed into Aviva, which sounds like a cross between a bus company and
a 1970’s Vauxhall.
However Yell have hilariously gone way beyond this and
announced last week that the new name for the business will be, wait for it …..
“hibu”. Heavily in debt and making huge losses this is the best they can come
up with. Mike Pocock, Chief Executive said that the company needed a new name
because it was “viewed as a dinosaur”. Was he suggesting that if Tyrannosaurus
Rex had changed its name this would have saved it from extinction? Another step
down the road to extinction for Yell, sorry “HIBU”.
HP and Autonomy
HP announced 25,000 jobs cuts. It was going to be 24,999 but
they decided to include Mike Lynch, CEO of Autonomy that HP had paid $10.3bn to
acquire just seven months ago. “Licence revenue was disappointing, sales
execution was a challenge and big deals were taking longer to close”, said HP’s
finance director, Kathie Lesjak.
However long before the sale to HP UK stock market
analysts were critical of Autonomy and advising investors to sell. Mike Lynch
claimed these critics did not understand complex software businesses like his. Apart
from one, the critics could not quite put their finger on what made them
uncomfortable about Autonomy. The one who did was Marc Geall and he had
actually worked for Autonomy for 2 years, before joining Deutche Bank in June
2010. Here are some extracts from a note Geall issued in October 2010.
“The management structure, control
and systems at Autonomy are more representative of a start-up than a major
global player … Autonomy's sales force are "hunters not farmers" …the
investment in the business has lagged revenues ... [which] could affect
customer satisfaction towards the product and value it delivers."
Most of the other analysts applied conventional analysis
criteria to Autonomy. These were easily batted away by Lynch, who believed they
did not really apply to his business. By contrast Geall comments on aspects of
the core characteristics of Autonomy's organisational culture, how it thinks
and behaves and how these could impact on future performance. You can read the
full article we published in 2010 by clicking here.
Much is being made of the bureaucratic HP culture stifling
the entrepreneurial spirit in Autonomy, with some justification. However what
Geall’s analysis showed was that Autonomy’s culture which was once its strength
was becoming its weakness and this has now manifested itself under HP’s
ownership after just seven months.
So that was some of the week before this week. We hope you found some of the above thought provoking and useful for you and your business. We trust you had a good weekend and hope you have a great week this week.
So that was some of the week before this week. We hope you found some of the above thought provoking and useful for you and your business. We trust you had a good weekend and hope you have a great week this week.
No comments:
Post a Comment